Skip to content

Y.B. Ashwathanarayan v. Union of India

LOK Law Journal

LOK 2026 (11) Kar. 60

Equivalent citations: 2026 KHC 61902

Court
High Court of Karnataka
Bench
M. I. Arun; J.
Decided on
Case No.
W.P. No. 18821 of 2024; 4630, 5168, 22460 of 2025

Counsel For the petitioners — Kiran S. Javali, Senior Advocate, for Mahendra Gouda C.R. and Mayank Jain. Thammaiah H.N. in W.P. No. 22460 of 2025. For the respondents — S.V. Raju with Anuparna Bordoloi, and B.S. Prasad

Money Laundering

Provisions referred

Headnote

Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, 2002 — Sections 2(1)(u) and 3 — Scheduled offence — Proceeds of crime.

The Court held that proceedings under the PMLA depend on a scheduled offence and proceeds of crime. In the land case, the underlying complaint had been closed for want of sanction and that closure had attained finality. On those facts, the ED’s continuing inquiry into proceeds of crime from the alleged scheduled offences could not be sustained. (Paras 17–20)

Full text locked

The full judgment is being updated in the library. Contact the Librarian on WhatsApp for a copy.

Contact Librarian · 9387770303 Read the report

Also on YouTubeInstagramFacebookNiyamavartha