8 judgments match your search. Search by party name, citation (e.g. LOK 2026 (10) Ker. 5), case number, judge or words in the judgment, or pick a date of decision.
LOK 2026 (10) Ker. 247 · High Court of Kerala
Equivalent citations: 2026 KER 85513
Mutual mistake about the identity of the property made the agreement void. The High Court set aside specific performance and granted the alternative relief of refund.
LOK 2026 (10) Ker. 240 · High Court of Kerala
Equivalent citations: 2026 KER 81015
Workman status depends on the dominant nature of the duties. Once the Labour Court found that the Branch Manager was outside Section 2(s), it had no jurisdiction to decide the merits of his dismissal.
LOK 2026 (10) Ker. 246 · High Court of Kerala
Equivalent citations: 2026 KER 81602
The Kerala High Court upheld stepping up of seniors’ pay under FR 22 where juniors drew more after personal financial upgradations, and rejected BSNL’s objections based on voluntary retirement and limitation.
LOK 2026 (10) Ker. 245 · High Court of Kerala
Equivalent citations: 2026 KER 81602
The High Court upheld stepping up of senior employees’ pay where their juniors drew more in the same post because of personal time-bound upgradation. It rejected BSNL’s objections based on voluntary retirement and delay.
LOK 2026 (10) Ker. 241 · High Court of Kerala
Equivalent citations: 2026 KER 81401
LOK 2026 (10) Ker. 242 · High Court of Kerala
Equivalent citations: 2026 KER 81495
The High Court directed the Traffic Regulatory Committee to hear the petitioner and stakeholders and decide a complaint that autorickshaw parking obstructed access to a commercial building.
LOK 2026 (10) Ker. 243 · High Court of Kerala
Equivalent citations: 2026 KER 82055
The High Court affirmed the conviction, finding the child witness’s testimony independently sufficient and treating the DNA evidence and extra-judicial confession as corroboration.
LOK 2026 (10) Ker. 244 · High Court of Kerala
Equivalent citations: 2026 KER 81704
The Chief Engineer (HRM) was competent under the Board’s delegation to sanction prosecution. The High Court upheld refusal of discharge because the billing and ledger material warranted trial.