Skip to content
LAW LIBRARY.Online
Central Act · India · Part II · Chapter II — Relevancy of Facts

Section 27 BSA Relevancy of certain evidence for proving, in subsequent proceeding, truth of facts therein stated

Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 · Edition: Original enacted Gazette, 25 December 2023; supplied UP Police IEA comparison (printed pages 9–25)

Evidence given by a witness in a judicial proceeding, or before any person authorised by law to take it, is relevant for the purpose of proving, in a subsequent judicial proceeding, or in a later stage of the same judicial proceeding, the truth of the facts which it states, when the witness is dead or cannot be found, or is incapable of giving evidence, or is kept out of the way by the adverse party, or if his presence cannot be obtained without an amount of delay or expense which, under the circumstances of the case, the Court considers unreasonable:

Provided that the proceeding was between the same parties or their representatives in interest; that the adverse party in the first proceeding had the right and opportunity to cross-examine and the questions in issue were substantially the same in the first as in the second proceeding.

Explanation.—A criminal trial or inquiry shall be deemed to be a proceeding between the prosecutor and the accused within the meaning of this section.

Source document ↗

Judgments on Section 27

LOK 2026 (10) Ker. 132 · High Court of Kerala

Najeeb v. State of Kerala

Equivalent citations: 2026 KER 78634

ActsCode of Criminal Procedure (Cr.P.C) - Section 299

Whether the trial in a Sessions Case against co-accused (A1–A16) can be kept in abeyance pending completion of investigation and filing of a final report against other co-accused (A17–A26) accused of harboring/conspiracy. Whether recording evidence in a separate trial against main accused persons causes legal…

LOK 2026 (7) SC 314 · Supreme Court of India

Mahendra Singh v. State of Chhattisgarh

Equivalent citations: 2026 (7) SCD 314 : 2026 INSC 775

SubjectCriminal
ActsCode of Criminal Procedure 1973 - Section 299

The Supreme Court considered whether evidence recorded in a trial against a co-accused could be used against the appellant, who was an absconding accused at the time, upon his subsequent arrest and trial. The Court emphasized that Section 299 Cr.P.C. acts as an exception to…