Skip to content
LAW LIBRARY.Online
Central Act · India · PART I — Suits in General

Section 20 CPC Other suits to be instituted where defendants reside or cause of action arises

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 · Edition: User-supplied Law Library CPC page, attributed to India Code as on 10 January 2026; retrieved 6 November 2026

Subject to the limitations aforesaid, every suit shall be instituted in a Court within the local limits of whose jurisdiction—

(a) the defendant, or each of the defendants where there are more than one, at the time of the commencement of the suit, actually and voluntarily resides, or carries on business, or personally works for gain; or

(b) any of the defendants, where there are more than one, at the time of the commencement of the suit, actually and voluntarily resides, or carries on business, or personally works for gain, provided that in such case either the leave of the Court is given, or the defendants who do not reside, or carry on business, or personally works for gain, as aforesaid, acquiesce in such institution; or

(c) the cause of action, wholly or in part, arises. 1* * * * *

2[Explanation].—A corporation shall be deemed to carry on business at its sole or principal office 3in [India] or, in respect of any cause of action arising at any place where it has also a subordinate office, at such place.

(a) A is a tradesman in Calcutta, B carries on business in Delhi. B, by his agent in Calcutta, buys goods of A and requests A to deliver them to the East Indian Railway Company. A delivers the goods accordingly in Calcutta. A may sue B for the price of the goods either in Calcutta, where the cause of action has arisen, or in Delhi, where B carries on business.

(b) A resides at Simla, B at Calcutta and C at Delhi. A, B and C being together at Benaras, B and C make a joint promissory note payable on demand, and deliver it to A. A may sue B and C at Benaras, where the cause of action arose. He may also sue them at Calcutta, where B resides, or at Delhi, where C resides; but in each of these cases, if the non-resident defendant objects, the suit cannot proceed without the leave of the Court.

Source document ↗

Judgments on Section 20

LOK 2026 (9) SC 167 · Supreme Court of India

K. Rashik v. National Insurance Company Ltd.

Equivalent citations: 2026 INSC 996

Under Section 166(2) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, a claimant has four distinct options to institute a claim application: (a) where the accident occurred, (b) where the claimant resides, (c) where the claimant carries on business, or (d) where the defendant resides. The legislature…