Skip to content
LAW LIBRARY.Online
Central Act · India · Chapter XVII — Of Penalties in Case of Dishonour of Certain Cheques for Insufficiency of Funds in the Accounts

Section 141 Offences by companies

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 · Edition: India Code central text incorporating the 2018 amendment

1) If the person committing an offence under section 138 is a company, every person who, at the time the offence was committed, was in charge of, and was responsible to, the company for the conduct of the business of the company, as well as the company, shall be deemed to be guilty of the offence and shall be liable to be proceeded against and punished accordingly:

Provided that nothing contained in this sub-section shall render any person liable to punishment if he proves that the offence was committed without his knowledge, or that he had exercised all due diligence to prevent the commission of such offence:

6[Provided further that where a person is nominated as a Director of a company by virtue of his holding any office or employment in the Central Government or State Government or a financial corporation owned or controlled by the Central Government or the State Government, as the case may be, he shall not be liable for prosecution under this Chapter.]

(2) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (1), where any offence under this Act has been committed by a company and it is proved that the offence has been committed with the consent or connivance of, or is attributable to, any neglect on the part of, any director, manager, secretary or other officer of the company, such director, manager, secretary or other officer shall also be deemed to be guilty of that offence and shall be liable to be proceeded against and punished accordingly.

Explanation.—For the purposes of this section, —

(a) “company” means any body corporate and includes a firm or other association of individuals; and

(b) “director”, in relation to a firm, means a partner in the firm.

Source document ↗

Judgments on Section 141

LOK 2026 (10) SC 293 · Supreme Court of India

M/s. Mansi Finance (Chennai) Ltd. v. Lalitha

Equivalent citations: 2026 INSC 1174

The applicant sought clarification of the judgment dated 26 May 2026, which had partly restored cheque-dishonour proceedings. He contended that the position under Maharashtra’s money-lending law differed from Tamil Nadu’s law and that the earlier judgment should not be treated as validating recovery of unlicensed…

LOK 2011 (9) SC 271 · Supreme Court of India

Thermax Ltd. v. K.M. Johny

Equivalent citations: 2012 CriLJ 438 : JT 2011 (11) SC 241 : 2011 (11) Scale 128 : (2011) 13 SCC 412 : 2011 (14) SCR 154 : 2011 4 KLT SN 87 : 2011 KHC 4892

ActsBharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, 406 and 420, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973

A contractual dispute given a criminal colour after long delay and suppression of earlier closed complaints; complaint and Section 156(3) direction quashed, and directors not vicariously liable.