Skip to content

Judgments

7 judgments match your search. Search by party name, citation (e.g. LOK 2026 (10) Ker. 5), case number, judge or words in the judgment, or pick a date of decision.

Clear

LOK 2026 (9) Ker. 11 · High Court of Kerala

Thomas Thomas v. State of Kerala

Equivalent citations: 2026 (9) KLR 1 : 2026 KER 66530

SubjectPOCSO
ActsProtection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act 2012

Definition under Section 3(d) does not mandate oral sex or deeper penetration – Any intentional physical contact where the mouth is applied to the specified private parts (penis, vagina, anus, or urethra) of a child satisfies the statutory requirement – Kissing the penis of a…

LOK 2026 (9) Ker. 13 · High Court of Kerala

Roopa P. Joy v. Union of India

Equivalent citations: 2026 (9) KLR 15 : 2026 KER 66329

The Court held that the age restrictions prescribed under Section 4(iii)(c)(I) of the Surrogacy (Regulation) Act, 2021, are constitutionally valid, serving as a reasonable and non-arbitrary classification based on medical, ethical, and social welfare considerations. The Court distinguished the present case from Vijaya Kumari S…

LOK 2026 (9) Ker. 14 · High Court of Kerala

Reji v. State of Kerala

Equivalent citations: 2026 (9) KLR 16 : 2026 KER 66679

Allegation of false implication due to prior enmity – Whether minor victim’s testimony reliable – Held, the testimony of the minor victim, if found consistent and credible, constitutes sterling evidence – Claims of prior enmity between accused and victim’s family or alleged love relationship are…

LOK 2026 (9) Ker. 15 · High Court of Kerala

Rasheed v. Sub Inspector of Police

Equivalent citations: 2026 (9) KLR 17 : 2026 KER 66632

Prosecution proved recovery of 150 grams of ganja from the person of the accused and 1900 grams of ganja from the bedroom of the house occupied by the accused, based on disclosure statement under Section 27 of the Evidence Act - Contention of the accused…

LOK 2026 (9) Ker. 16 · High Court of Kerala

Priya Sreeraj v. Union of India

Equivalent citations: 2026 (9) KLR 18 : 2026 KER 66664

The Court held that the mandatory requirement of "written informed consent" under Section 22(1)(a) of the ART Act must be interpreted alongside the principle of "deceased’s inferred consent" and the partner’s interest in procreation. Where a hospital fails to obtain the prescribed ‘Form 9’ consent,…

LOK 2026 (9) Ker. 17 · High Court of Kerala

M/s Soubhagye Road Builders v. Reserve Bank of India

Equivalent citations: 2026 (9) KLR 14 : 2026 KER 66606

The Court dismissed the writ appeal, holding that the appellant, having failed to raise the claim of MSME protection under the 2015 Notification in the initial round of litigation (where only installment relief was sought), is barred by the principles of constructive res judicata and…