Skip to content

Judgments

11 judgments match your search. Search by party name, citation (e.g. LOK 2026 (10) Ker. 5), case number, judge or words in the judgment, or pick a date of decision.

Clear

LOK 2026 (10) SC 121 · Supreme Court of India

Haramani Sahoo v. Lalita Nayak

Equivalent citations: 2026 INSC 1112 : 2026 KLT OnLine 4675

SubjectCivil Law
ActsCode of Civil Procedure, 1908 - Order VI Rule 17

Order VI Rule 17 CPC confers discretionary power to permit amendments necessary for determining real questions in controversy. Post commencement of trial, the proviso requires satisfaction of due diligence. Subsequent discovery of a compromise decree (in T.S. No. 105 of 1998) directly affecting title to…

LOK 2026 (10) SC 125 · Supreme Court of India

Arcis Clean Energy Pvt. Ltd. v. Parshva Innovation

Equivalent citations: 2026 INSC 1109

ActsArbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Section 11(6); Sections 2(e) and 11(12)(b)); Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (Section 20(c)); Indian Contract Act, 1872 (Sections 23 and 28)

When an arbitration clause names two different places for arbitration, neither automatically becomes the juridical seat; reading the agreement harmoniously with an exclusive jurisdiction clause fixes the seat at the place whose courts have exclusive jurisdiction (Goa) and treats the other (Delhi) as a venue.

LOK 2026 (10) Ker. 121 · High Court of Kerala

James V. Kurian v. V.K. Sam

Equivalent citations: 2026 KER 78313 : 2026 KLT OnLine 2353 : 2026 KHC OnLine 941

SubjectCivil Law
ActsCode of Civil Procedure, 1908 - Section 47 & Order XXXII Rule 15

Revision petitioners/judgment debtors challenged the execution of a decree for declaration of title and mandatory injunction, contending that the decree was a nullity as no enquiry was conducted under Order XXXII Rule 15 CPC regarding the alleged unsoundness of mind of the deceased first respondent.…

LOK 2026 (10) Ker. 122 · High Court of Kerala

Manoj Abraham John v. State of Kerala

Equivalent citations: 2026 KER 78024

SubjectNDPS Act
ActsPrevention of Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1988

Challenge to detention order passed against the detenue on grounds of an unexplained delay of 78 days between the last prejudicial activity (12.12.2025) and the issuance of the detention order (28.04.2026), and non-application of mind in fixing the maximum detention period of one year under…