7 judgments match your search. Search by party name, citation (e.g. LOK 2026 (10) Ker. 5), case number, judge or words in the judgment, or pick a date of decision.
LOK 2026 (11) SC 67 · Supreme Court of India
Equivalent citations: 2026 INSC 1200
To execute the 2011 decree giving Himachal Pradesh 7.19% of Bhakra-Beas power, Punjab and Haryana must supply about 11,973 MU over 20 lean seasons after adjusting its capital-cost liability.
LOK 2026 (10) SC 302 · Supreme Court of India
Equivalent citations: 2026 INSC 1178
DVC may recover both depreciation and its Sinking Fund contribution through tariff under Section 40 of the DVC Act; APTEL’s review reopening this against binding precedent was set aside with exemplary costs.
LOK 2026 (5) SC 84 · Supreme Court of India
Equivalent citations: 2026 INSC 464
LOK 2026 (5) SC 710 · Supreme Court of India
Equivalent citations: 2026 (5) SCD 72 : 2026 INSC 461
LOK 2026 (3) SC 258 · Supreme Court of India
Equivalent citations: 2026 INSC 296
The State may withdraw or modify an electricity duty exemption granted under Section 5A in the public interest, but fairness demands reasonable notice; the 2000 and 2001 notifications were held to operate only after one year.
LOK 2026 (3) SC 259 · Supreme Court of India
Equivalent citations: 2026 INSC 294
A State Electricity Regulatory Commission may consider a central incentive while fixing tariff, but must give it the purpose intended; the Generation Based Incentive for wind generators is payable over and above the tariff and cannot be deducted.
LOK 2026 (1) SC 58 · Supreme Court of India
Equivalent citations: 2026 INSC 1 : (2026) 3 SCC 143