Skip to content

Judgments

12 judgments match your search. Search by party name, citation (e.g. LOK 2026 (10) Ker. 5), case number, judge or words in the judgment, or pick a date of decision.

Clear

LOK 2026 (10) SC 151 · Supreme Court of India

Yes Bank Ltd. v. Axis Trustee Services Ltd.

Equivalent citations: 2026 INSC 1132

SubjectBanking
ActsBanking Regulation Act, 1949

Appeals were preferred against the judgment of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay setting aside the decision dated March 14, 2020, of the Administrator appointed for Yes Bank Limited, whereby Basel III Compliant AT-1 Bonds worth Rs. 8,415 crore were completely written down permanently…

LOK 2026 (10) SC 153 · Supreme Court of India

Sunil Kumar v. Iffco Tokio General Insurance Company Ltd.

Equivalent citations: 2026 INSC 1145

Functional disability for loss of earning capacity must be assessed realistically on the victim’s loss of earning capacity in the open market, not solely on the medical certificate; lifelong attendant charges are computed by the multiplier method.

LOK 2026 (10) SC 154 · Supreme Court of India

Madhu Kudapa (Formerly Known As K. Madhusudhan Rao) v. M/S Lodha Healthy Constructions and Developer Private Limited (LHCPL) & Anr.

Equivalent citations: 2026 INSC 1131

Restitution restores and returns value to the person at whose expense a benefit was received; it does not redistribute or confer a windfall gain. Where a builder defaults on delivering an apartment financed partly by the homebuyer's personal funds and partly by a bank loan…

LOK 2026 (10) SC 155 · Supreme Court of India

Secretary to Government v. Sameer Ahamed

Equivalent citations: 2026 INSC 1129

SubjectConversion
ActsConstitution of India, 1950 - Articles 16(4) & 226

Whether a person belonging to a Backward Class, Most Backward Class, Denotified Community, or Scheduled Caste prior to converting from Hinduism to Islam can automatically claim the status and consequential reservation benefits of a Backward Class Muslim. Whether Government Order G.O.(Ms.) No. 31 dated 09.03.2024,…

LOK 2026 (10) SC 156 · Supreme Court of India

Just Rights For Children Alliance v. S. Harish

Equivalent citations: 2026 INSC 1149

While Section 15 of the POCSO Act requires visual depiction of child sexual abuse for penal liability, Section 67B of the IT Act and Rules 3(1)(b) & 4(4) of the IT Rules are regulatory and broader in sweep. CSEAM under the IT framework encompasses all…

LOK 2026 (10) SC 157 · Supreme Court of India

Deepak Raheja v. Omkara Assets Reconstruction Private Ltd.

Equivalent citations: 2026 INSC 1134

Jurisdiction of the Supreme Court under Section 62 of the Code is strictly confined to questions of law arising out of the order of the NCLAT. Where the Adjudicating Authority (NCLT) and Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) have concurrently returned findings of fact and law upon the…

LOK 2026 (10) Ker. 151 · High Court of Kerala

Mohammed Riyas P.A. v. Adv. K.M. Shajahan

Equivalent citations: 2026 KER 79184

When information forwarded by the Enforcement Directorate under Section 66(2) of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 contains sufficient material disclosing the commission of a cognizable offence under the Prevention of Corruption Act, a preliminary inquiry is not mandatory and can be dispensed with.…

LOK 2026 (10) Ker. 156 · High Court of Kerala

Sandeep Chandrasenan v. Usha Krishnakumar

Equivalent citations: 2026 KER 79190

While Section 421 of the Companies Act provides an appeal against NCLT orders, non-exercise of jurisdiction under Article 226 is a rule of self-restraint. Alternative remedy does not bar writ jurisdiction where principles of natural justice are violated. Relegating the party to an alternative remedy…

LOK 2026 (10) Ker. 157 · High Court of Kerala

Sreelakshmi P.B. v. Kerala State Pollution Control Board

Equivalent citations: 2026 KER 79382

ActsService Law — Transfer — Constitution of India, Article 226 — Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974, Section 11A

Whether the transfer order dated 07.07.2026 moving the appellants to the Board’s Head Office at Thiruvananthapuram was liable to be interfered with under Article 226, on grounds of want of power, breach of the work distribution order, mala fides or punitive intent. [Paras 2, 4]

LOK 2026 (10) Ker. 158 · High Court of Kerala

Krishnankutty U.P. v. State of Kerala

Equivalent citations: 2026 KER 79734

ActsPenal Code, 1860 — Sections 405, 406, 415 and 420 — Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 482

The elephant, originally owned by K.V. Sadanandan, was given to the Mata Amritanandamayi Math in 1999 as a calf and renamed “Raman”. When it developed musth and caused fear among devotees, the Math gifted it back to Sadanandan by a document dated 18.02.2017 (Annexure A4),…