Skip to content

Judgments

8 judgments match your search. Search by party name, citation (e.g. LOK 2026 (10) Ker. 5), case number, judge or words in the judgment, or pick a date of decision.

Clear

LOK 2026 (10) SC 151 · Supreme Court of India

Yes Bank Ltd. v. Axis Trustee Services Ltd.

Equivalent citations: 2026 INSC 1132

SubjectBanking
ActsBanking Regulation Act, 1949

Appeals were preferred against the judgment of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay setting aside the decision dated March 14, 2020, of the Administrator appointed for Yes Bank Limited, whereby Basel III Compliant AT-1 Bonds worth Rs. 8,415 crore were completely written down permanently…

LOK 2026 (10) Ker. 131 · High Court of Kerala

Bank of India v. Kerala State Nirmithi Kendra

Equivalent citations: 2026 KER 78231

SubjectBanking
ActsConstitution of India — Article 226.

A writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is ordinarily not maintainable to enforce or avoid contractual obligations voluntarily incurred, or to resolve mixed questions of law and fact arising purely out of a private field of contract without any public law…

LOK 2026 (8) SC 125 · Supreme Court of India

Punjab National Bank v. M/s. Shree Jyoti Education and Management Trust World

Equivalent citations: 2026 (8) SCD 127 : 2026 INSC 836 : AIR 2026 SC 3887

SubjectBanking
ActsRecovery of Debts and Bankruptcy Act 1993

The definition of 'debt' includes interest, and the Debts Recovery Tribunal is empowered to pass orders for the payment of interest from the date of the claim up to the date of realization. Courts are prohibited from re-opening transactions between a banking company and a…

LOK 2026 (7) Ker. 34 · High Court of Kerala

M. P. Jackson v. Reserve Bank of India

Equivalent citations: 2026 KER 48097

ActsBanking Regulation Act, 1949, Sections 35A, 36AA, 36AAA and 56; Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, 1969, Sections 28, 32 and 87; Constitution of India, Article 226

Consultation with the State Government is mandatory before supersession under Section 36AAA(1). The Court declined to disturb the existing order and required consultation before any extension.