Tag: Justice Aravind Kumar
-
Union of India v. Mohamed Rifas @ Mohamed Rigbas – 2026 INSC 1160 | LOK 2026 (10) SC 272
The Supreme Court held that the bar on bail to foreign nationals under Section 43D(7) of the UAPA applies only if the accused's entry into India was itself unauthorised or illegal; overstaying a valid visa is not enough. Even then, bail may be granted in very exceptional circumstances. Section 43D(7) does not override Section 43D(2),…
Recent Posts
- Piyush Deepak Narlawar v. State of Maharashtra
- Arjun Gopal v. Union of India
- Constitution of India
- Aayisha Muhsin v. Principal Secretary
- Girishbhai Natwarlal Patel v. Gautam Punjabhai Palkhiwala
Tags
bail Central Excise Act 1944 Cheque Bounce Child born from subsequent marriage Civil Procedure Civil Services (Karnataka) Clarification of earlier judgment Condonation Of Delay Constitutional Law Conventional heads Corruption and nepotism in recruitment Criminal Law Death of a 19-year-old bachelor Dishonour of Cheque Duplication of compensation Enhancement of award False information Family Law Family Pension Final judicial decisions Future prospects Interim continuation beyond retirement age Interpretation of statutes Justice N.V. Anjaria Justice S.V.N. Bhatti Legally Enforceable Debt Limitation Loss of dependency Negotiable Instruments Act 1881 Notional income Parental consortium Police Protection Prevention of Corruption Act 1988 Priority over dependent parents Private person can complain of an offence under S. 125-A. Remarriage of childless widow Representation of the People Act 1951 Section 138 NI Act Service Law Supreme Court Territorial Jurisdiction Textiles Committee Act 1963 Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act 1967 Validation of Selection and Appointment of 2011 Batch Gazetted Probationers Act 2022 Whether bar under S. 195(1)(a) CrPC applies
Comments
[…] Read the case headnote ↗ […]
[…] Read the case headnote ↗ […]